<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Momocello</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.momocello.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.momocello.com</link>
	<description>Amakakeru Ryu no Hirameki &#124; Guillermo Siméon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:36:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Connexion SSL MySQL OpenSSL avec Natty (5.1.54)</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/connexion-ssl-mysql-openssl-avec-natty-5-1-54/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/connexion-ssl-mysql-openssl-avec-natty-5-1-54/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 18:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openSSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.momocello.com/?p=1720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem of &#8216;SSL connection error&#8216;&#8230; is still unsolved with MySQL-Natty 5.1.54 It seems nobody cares to address this bug. What works: Compile MySQL 5.1.54 with OpenSSL (on Natty) like here Use this &#171;&#160;secure&#160;&#187; version to receive SSL connection. Compile last Karmic version with OpenSSL and use this one to connect to 5.1.54 MySQL (OpenSSL) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/connexion-ssl-mysql-openssl-avec-natty-5-1-54/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTML5 et Adobe Flash, un regard éclairé</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/html5-adobe-flash-un-regard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/html5-adobe-flash-un-regard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 11:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.momocello.com/?p=1733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Un très bon article de Ray Valdes, VP chez Gartner : http://blogs.gartner.com/ray_valdes/2010/02/10/html5-and-flash/]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/html5-adobe-flash-un-regard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash AS3, bytesLoaded, bytesTotal problem, a look at mod_deflate</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/flash-as3-bytesloaded-bytestotal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/flash-as3-bytesloaded-bytestotal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bytesloaded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bytestotal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.momocello.com/?p=1702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my urge to explode Google PageSpeed, I enabled mod_deflate on apache2. Afer a few weeks, a colleague told me there was some weird behaviour with few AS3 preloaders on one of my servers&#8230; After sneaking around with bytesLoaded and bytesTotal, I have noticed this: [0,22236,14086,22236,22236,26647,26647] etc... This array stores: [bytesLoaded, bytesTotal, bytesLoaded, bytesTotal, etc,] [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/flash-as3-bytesloaded-bytestotal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open network chez Google ?</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/open-network-chez-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/open-network-chez-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[divers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.momocello.com/?p=1607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Par rapport aux méga-compagnies à la Bell Rogers Shaw etc (the big 6) du Canada qui veulent contrôler et freiner le développement technologique des plus petits (+ de 500 compagnies canadiennes) et même les forcer à plier bagage et fermer, on a souvent parlé de : * Créer un réseau de fibre optique Open et [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/open-network-chez-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RAID Performances Software VS Hardware</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/raid-performances-software-vs-hardware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/raid-performances-software-vs-hardware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 04:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[divers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.momocello.com/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pro Hardware Propriétaire, mais tout de même intéressant : http://www.adaptec.com/nr/rdonlyres/14b2fd84-f7a0-4ac5-a07a-214123ea3dd6/0/4423_sw_hwraid_10.pdf Neutre et plus : http://linux.yyz.us/why-software-raid.html]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/raid-performances-software-vs-hardware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackberry 8330, Le clavier ne répond plus&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/blackberry-8330-le-clavier-ne-repond-plus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/blackberry-8330-le-clavier-ne-repond-plus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8330]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momocello.com/?p=1518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Voici quelques façons de réparer un BlackBerry (Man these are Rock Solid!) &#160; 1- Votre fille lui fait prendre un bain (dans la toilette) * Retirez la batterie rapidement * Faites sécher derrière une fenêtre au soleil (toute la journée) * ...jusqu'à ce qu'il n'y ai plus de buée * Remettez la batterie * [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/blackberry-8330-le-clavier-ne-repond-plus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mod_ssl VS gnutls, mpm-worker problem</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/mod_ssl-vs-gnutls-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/mod_ssl-vs-gnutls-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gnutls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mod_ssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpm-worker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momocello.com/?p=1495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have problems with mod_gnutls since Squeeze. This might confirm something, at least if you use the multithreaded mpm-worker. 3 reasons for not using gnutls : 1 - No active development, same version for Squeeze, Wheezy and Sid 2 - Current version create a segmentation fault with apache server on Squeeze 3 - Just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/mod_ssl-vs-gnutls-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySQL OpenSSL error 2026 &#8216;SSL connection error&#8217; fix</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/mysql-openssl-error-2026-ssl-connection-error-fix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/mysql-openssl-error-2026-ssl-connection-error-fix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openSSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momocello.com/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The solution for the very annoying SSL connection error (since MySQL 5.1.38). You must omit these options : --ssl-cert AND --ssl-key e.g. mysql -u bill -p -h 123.456.789.0 --ssl --ssl-ca=/etc/mysql/ca-cert.pem or mysql -u bill -p -h 123.456.789.0 --ssl --ssl-ca=/dev/null Too simple&#8230; &#8230;MySQL should fix. It&#8217;s been a while since this one lives. Ciao. &#160;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/mysql-openssl-error-2026-ssl-connection-error-fix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Connexion SSL MySQL Debian Squeeze</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/connexion-sll-mysql-sur-debian-squeeze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/connexion-sll-mysql-sur-debian-squeeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openSSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momocello.com/?p=1426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Il semble qu&#8217;il sera impossible de recompiler MySQL avec OpenSSL avant longtemps&#8230; v5.5.8&#8230; Il semble que les développeur de MySQL ne désirent pas adresser le problème, puisqu&#8217;ils ont du mal à reproduire le problème!!!!? J&#8217;essai d&#8217;entrer en communication avec un développeur anglais qui dit avoir réussi à contourner le problème en passant un CPPFLAGS lors [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/connexion-sll-mysql-sur-debian-squeeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nagios NFS Mount Check avec check_nfs_mounts</title>
		<link>http://www.momocello.com/nagios-nfs-mount-check-avec-check_nfs_mounts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.momocello.com/nagios-nfs-mount-check-avec-check_nfs_mounts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Siméon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nagios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momocello.com/?p=1376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J&#8217;ai implanté un module de surveillance Nagios pour mes montages NFS. Toutefois, il y a un problème dans le fichier du module. Sur Debian, il faut modifier le fichier check_nfs_mounts.sh &#160; Téléchargement http://exchange.nagios.org... &#160; Modification nano check_nfs_mounts.sh Commenter #LIBEXEC="/usr/local/nagios/libexec" Ajouter LIBEXEC="/usr/lib/nagios/plugins" &#160; Example/survol d&#8217;implantation nano /etc/nagios-plugins/config/nfs_mounts.cfg define command{ &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;command_name check_nfs_mounts.sh &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;une seule ligne &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;command_line /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_nfs_mounts.sh [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.momocello.com/nagios-nfs-mount-check-avec-check_nfs_mounts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

